Original Research Open Access Logo

Verifying the accuracy of 3D-CRT dose distributions calculated by the Prowess Panther treatment planning system (TPS) with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for head-and-neck (H&N) patients

Luong Thi Oanh 1
Duong Thanh Tai 2, 3, *
Hoang Duc Tuan 1, 2
Truong Thi Hong Loan 2
  1. Faculty of Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
  2. Faculty of Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Science, VNU-HCM, Vietnam
  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong Nai General Hospital, Bien Hoa, Vietnam
Correspondence to: Duong Thanh Tai, Faculty of Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Science, VNU-HCM, Vietnam; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong Nai General Hospital, Bien Hoa, Vietnam. Email: thanhtai_phys@yahoo.com.
Volume & Issue: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019) | Page No.: 90-99 | DOI: 10.32508/stdjns.v3i2.518
Published: 2019-08-09

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • Abstract Views: 0
  • Galley Views: 0

Statistics from Dimensions

This article is published with open access by Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify and compare the three Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) dose distributions calculated by the Prowess Panther treatment planning system (TPS) with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for head-and-neck (H&N) patients. In this study, we used the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code which includes BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc programs. Firstly, the clinical 6 MV photon beams form Siemens Primus linear accelerator at Dong Nai General Hospital were simulated using the BEAMnrc. Secondly, the absorbed dose to patients treated by 3D-CRT was computed using the DOSXYZnrc. Finally, the simulated dose distributions were then compared with the ones calculated by the Fast Photon Effective algorithm on the TPS, using the relative dose error comparison and the gamma index using global methods implemented in PTW-VeriSoft with 3%/3 mm. There is a good agreement between the MC and TPS dose. The average gamma passing rates were 92.8% based on the 3%/3 mm. The average dose in the PTV agreed well between the TPS with 0.97% error. MC predict dose was higher than the mean dose to the parotid glands and spinal cord compared to TPS. We have implemented the EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo simulation to verify the 3D-CRT plans generated by Prowess Panther TPS. Our results showed that the TPS agreed with the one of MC.

 

Comments